References

Results Oriented Monitoring (ROM) reviews aim to assist the European Commission’s services and EU Delegations in monitoring of and reporting on EU financed development and cooperation projects and programmes in third countries through independent reviews of the progress of their implementation and the achievement of project results.

The systematic and timely evaluation of its programs and activities is a clear priority for the European Commission. The objective of the evaluations is to take stock of the achievements, quality and results of the Actions, in the context of a strategy of cooperation in constant evolution that is increasingly based on results-oriented approaches. From this perspective, evaluations should seek evidence of why, which and how these results are linked to the EU intervention and identify the key factors that motivate or hinder progress.

Elaboration of a study that presents a current environmental profile of Mali and identifies the specific environmental problems as well as the necessary actions to reduce the possible negative impacts on the environment by cooperation supporters, respectively to improve the consideration of the environmental aspects in these supports.

Results Oriented Monitoring (ROM) reviews aim to assist the European Commission’s services and EU Delegations in monitoring of and reporting on EU financed development and cooperation projects and programmes in third countries through independent reviews of the progress of their implementation and the achievement of project results.

The EPJUST II programme was designed to address some of the weaknesses identified in rule of law in the Philippines, in particular key obstacles related to justice accessibility and enforceability.
The main objectives of this evaluation were to provide the relevant services of the European Union, the interested stakeholders and the wider public with:

• An overall independent assessment of the past performance of the EPJUST II Programme, paying

particular attention to its intermediate results measured against its objectives;

• Key recommendations about sustainability of the action and exit strategy
• Key lessons and recommendations, to be drawn also from the evaluation in order to improve

current implementation and future actions.

The evaluation’s main objectives were to present:

• an independent overall assessment of the results of the NFD intervention, focusing particularly on the results of the project in relation to its objectives
• the main findings of the intervention and recommendations to improve the current measures and future actions and future strategic choices, also with a view to a possible rider to the project.

The main beneficiaries of this evaluation were the European Union Delegation and the Republic of Madagascar, the Government of Madagascar PREA (Programme of Strengthening the efficiency of the Administration), the contractors and the technical assistance team of the NFD project.
The evaluation was also of interest to the technical and financial partners and to civil society in general.

The overall objective of the consultancy was to build capacity of the National Directorate for Statistics of the Ministry of Planning, Investment and Economic Development (FMoPIED), and Statistics Departments of Puntland Ministry of Planning, Investment and Economic Development (PLMoPIED) and Southwest Administration Ministry of Planning, Investment and Economic Development (SWAMoPIED) to enable these institutions to effectively conduct, supervise and coordinate the statistical activities in the areas under their jurisdiction.

The global objective of this assignment is to contribute towards effective implementation of Integrated Catchment Management in Lesotho through following up on previous operationalisation of the ICM framework, including improved coordination among relevant stakeholders in line with the Long-term Water and Sanitation Strategy.

The global objective of the assignment is to support the Government of Liberia in implementing its Intended National Determined Contributions by operationalising the EU-Liberia Climate Change Alliance.

The main objective of the evaluation was to: ‘assess how coherently Finland’s development policy and its targets relating to forced displacement have been implemented and how the coherence could be enhanced’.