Nuestros proyectos

The global objective was to elaborate clear options and modalities of intervention for appropriate EU-ASEAN support actions in enhancing the capacity of AHA Centre (ASEAN Coordinating Centre for Humanitarian Assistance on disaster management) to achieve operational excellence in disaster monitoring and emergency response and strengthening the capacity and role of the ASEAN Emergency Response and Assessment Team (ASEAN-ERAT).

Specific objective was to identify clear intervention options for the EU to support AHA Centre and formulate detailed design of the project through the Identification and formulation of the Action Document.

Two distinct phases were foreseen under this assignment to produce one single Project Document that represents the two above mentioned Concept Notes:

Phase 1) Identification of intervention areas and work scoping. This entailed production of an Identification Document.

Phase 2) Formulation of the actions and design of combined project. This entailed production of an Action Document.

The general objective of the mission was to realise the mid-term evaluation of PARJ (Support to Justice Reform Programme) and of the start of PARJ II

The objective was to provide sufficient information to decision-making bodies of the government of Tunisia, to the Delegation of the European Union and to other concerned parties in order to:

• appreciate the conception, relevance, efficiency and effectiveness of PARJ and PARJ II globally and independently and provide an assessment of the viability of the approach, of its visibility and the corrections to be made, especially on indicators of results and performance
• evaluate the management of PARJ and the activities of the different stakeholders (MJ, beneficiaries, UGPARJ, EUD, contractors etc.), manuals of procedures, the management of Twinning and of the ATPARJ, the financial and administrative as well as HR management, the archiving and monitoring of projects within the PMU, and activities of communication and visibility ;
• learn lessons from the intervention to improve the management of PARJ II and new projects to be financed by the European Union or by other donors in corresponding areas of intervention.

The specific objective was to draft the comprehensive report, policy paper and drafting instruction on the amendment of the Electoral Law Reform, the Political Parties Integrity Act, the legal reform to improve women participation in political life and all other relevant legislative reforms deemed necessary. Conducting of consultations and workshops with civil society, civil society organizations, political parties, and Solomon Islands Electoral Commission and government members was part of the assignment.

The project “Regeneration of Historical Centres in Local Government Units (RHC)” aimed at improving the social, cultural and economic development of Local Government Units and Municipalities in Palestine by regenerating their Historic Centres and support sustainable local development in these areas.

The Mid-term Review provided answered to "how" and "why" questions and was essential for assessing the value of the achieved results and of the implementation process of the whole intervention.

The review served the following functions:

• To support steering. On the basis of in-depth analyses, the review offered useful recommendations that are based on data (evidence-based).
• To contribute to learning. By analysing the development process, the review allowed to explain what works, what does not work and why, and to thus draw lessons for other interventions or for the elaboration of new policies, strategies and programmes.
• Accountability to the donor, partner and other internal actors by supplying an external assessment of the progress made and the results achieved.

The overall objective of the EU program to support the banana sector, of which this project was a part, is to contribute to the fight against poverty by supporting the competitiveness of the dessert banana sector in Côte d'Ivoire.

In this context the overall objective of the mid-term evaluation of the BAM program was to identify the main lessons learnt from the implementation at the current stage, to make recommendations of improvement and to make suggestions to assist future decisions on the program of the Banana Accompanying Measures in Côte d'Ivoire.

After the D+3 and the contractual limit of the funds of the Financing Agreement 22-548, the evaluation was to take stock of:

i) the commitment rates ii) the institutional set-up iii) the choice of modalities of implementation in order to draw immediate lessons learnt and possibly recommendations for future conventions.

In this context, the specific objective of this contract was to evaluate the modalities of implementation and to compare the results achieved with the objectives of each contract also at the level of the Financing Agreement for the various activities implemented in the framework of the financing agreement BAN / 22548, and to make suggestions for an optimal implementation of the remainder of the program.

Georgia faces a number of structural environmental challenges such as inadequate environmental protection legislation, poor monitoring, inspection and enforcement systems, and insufficient awareness, knowledge and capacities to help improve policies and strategies to protect the environment. Environmental governance is therefore a priority sector necessitating support in a number of critical areas.

The overall objective to which this assignment contributes was to support the Government of Georgia in complying with the environmental governance obligations under the EU-Georgia Association Agreement.

The specific objective of this assignment is to support the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia (MENRP) to strengthen legislation and implementation of measures in the areas of Environmental Liability, Environmental Impact Assessments / Strategic Environmental Assessments and Industrial pollution and industrial hazards, and to monitor the implementation of the Roadmaps for EU Approximation in environment and climate action fields.

The above assistance was provided in compliance with the provisions in Annex XXVI of the Association Agreement and the Roadmaps for approximation in the areas of Environmental Governance and Industrial pollution and industrial hazards.

The principal beneficiary was the MENRP. In addition, the assignment targeted all relevant stakeholders involved in the support to environment and climate action in Georgia, including government bodies, civil society, donors, financing institutions and implementing agencies.

The European Union sent an expert mission to assess the upcoming Presidential primary elections, ahead of the upcoming general elections in Honduras, tentatively foreseen for November 2017 at the time of the mission.

The purpose of the Pre-election Expert Mission was to collect factual information concerning this election process, in line with the criteria contained in the Commission Communication on Electoral Assistance and Observation [COM(2000)191].Moreover, the objective of the mission was to produce strategic analysis and reporting on the ongoing electoral processes and to provide input for electoral reform as well as confidence-enhancing measures during and after the elections.

The purpose of this project was to support the Beneficiary country’s institutions in implementation of the EU Birds and Habitats Directive.

Through the project, the Contractor assisted the authorities in implementing the NATURA 2000 network requirements in accordance with the national and EU legislation.

This project also aimed at laying foundations to future establishment of Natura 2000 network.

In this regard the project aims to initially identify the potential Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) in accordance to Habitats Directive and potential Special Protection Areas (SPAs) in accordance to Birds Directive.

In this identification it was important to fully align the national legislation with these two EU directives, thus legislative work was needed as a base to provide conditions to implement measures to future potential Natura 2000 sites, in order to reach the following results:

1. Harmonization of National legislation with EU directives related to nature protection ( Prepared draft Amendments to the Law on Nature Protection and other relevant implementing (primary and secondary) legislation, and Prepared Plan for implementation of Birds and Habitat Directives);

2. Assessment at national level of potential sites, according Birds and Habitat Directives, for NATURA 2000 Network (At least seven potential Natura 2000 sites proposed which would correspond to the requirements of Birds and Habitats Directives)

3. GIS system for NATURA 2000 developed;

4. Administrative capacity for implementation of nature protection legislation strengthened;

5. Public awareness campaign for NATURA 2000 implemented.

The main objectives of the evaluation were to provide the relevant external co-operation services of the contributing partners the African Union and, when appropriate, the wider public with:

• an overall independent assessment of the past performance (from 1 January 2013 until 31 December 2015) of the intervention (Sustaining and strengthening African Union’s Liaison Offices in post-conflict countries), paying particular attention to the results of the project against its objectives;
• key lessons learnt and recommendations in order to improve current and future action.

The evaluation was intended to inform the remaining period of implementation of the project, as well as the additional support to the AULO from 1 January 2018.

Evaluations should serve decision-making, learning and management purposes. This evaluation did provide indications to both the AUC and partners on key aspects of the programme management, and fed in the discussion on perspective mandate renewals.

L’objectif global était de contribuer à la conservation de la biodiversité et des services écosystémiques pour un développement durable en Afrique de l’Ouest.

L’objectif spécifique était de renforcer durablement la conservation des écosystèmes du complexe WAP (W, Pendjari, Arly) dans une perspective régionale et avec optimisation des bénéfices pour la population riveraine.

L'évaluation avait pour principaux objectifs de présenter aux services de coopération extérieure concernés de l’Union européenne, au gouvernement partenaire et, le cas échéant, au grand public:

• Une appréciation globale, en toute indépendance, des résultats de l’intervention du PAPE en s’attachant plus particulièrement aux résultats du projet par rapport à ses objectifs;
• Les principaux enseignements de l'intervention et des recommandations afin d’améliorer les mesures en cours et les futures actions dans le cadre du PIR 11 FED.