Unsere Projekte

The Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland (MFA) commissions regularly meta-evaluations in order to synthesise the findings, explore the issues and assess the reliability of the decentralised evaluations.

The assessment included all decentralised evaluations completed in 2018-2020. The assignment consisted of three components:

• a meta-evaluation assessing the quality of the decentralized evaluations under consideration
• a meta-analysis assessing overal quality of development coperation and its results based on the decentralized evaluations
• an assessment of the utility and usefulness of the decentralized evaluations.

The purpose of the meta-evaluation was to continue the series of meta-evlauations in order to see the development since the previous analysis, to learn from successes and setbacks as well as to see how the recommendations of the previous meta-evaluations have been used and how they have led to better quality of evaluations and development results.

The final evaluation report is available here: https://um.fi/publications/-/asset_publisher/TVOLgBmLyZvu/content/metaevaluointi-hanke-ja-ohjelmaevaluoinneista-2017-2020/384998

The Roadmap for the EU's involvement with Malagasy civil society defined four overall priorities with a long-term vision representing the structural changes that the EU planned to achieve through its work with civil society and the Malagasy government. In fact, since the set-up of a continuous EU-CS political dialogue, the EU's engagement with civil society in Madagascar became strategic. CSOs no longer considered the EU as a donor but as a true partner, thus confirming the EU's willingness to honour its new commitment to CS.

Under the 10th EDF, the Dinika Programme (€10 million) supported Malagasy civil society organisations from 2013 to 2017 in the regions of Analamanga, Analanjirofo and Atsimo-Andrefana. The purpose of this programme was to serve as a "laboratory" to develop new forms of dialogue, interaction, and a pool of more detailed knowledge on the dynamics within civil society. As part of the implementation of the 11th EDF, a new agreement on financing the Integrated Civil Society Support Mechanism in Madagascar, Dinika (2), was signed in September 2017 for a period of 5 years. This financing agreement had a total budget of €9.5 million with a contribution from the 11th EDF of €8 million and was jointly funded by the German cooperation through the GIZ with a further €1.5 million.

With regard to the EIDHR, as a result of a call for proposals in 2017, three projects were contracted.

For the Civil Society Organisations Thematic Programme, two calls for proposals made it possible to contract 13 grants (6 in 2016 and 7 in 2018). The 13 actions shared a partnership approach between non-state actors/civil society organisations and, sometimes, with local authorities.

The call for proposals of the 2018 CSO/LA Thematic Programme, enabled 4 projects to be contracted. Their aim was to help improve local governance and got communal services functioning properly to allow a real and efficient exercise of the prerogatives of Local Authorities for the benefit of their population, and involving the consultation of citizens.

The specific objective of the mission was to ensure monitoring and on-the-ground support of the progress of both ongoing and future projects that have been contracted under the CSO Thematic Programme and the EIDHR 2019-2020, while offering technical support to strengthen the capacities of grant recipients.

Global objective

The global objective of this assignment was enhancing Chinese CSO's capacities to contribute to governance and development processes in China.

Specific objective(s)

• Improve local CSOs capacity for better project management, including enhanced financial and contractual management capacities and standard procedures.
• Improve local CSOs' understanding of thematic/conceptual content in the field of social sectors, with focus on results and emphasis on the most vulnerable beneficiaries
• All EU funded actions apply rights-based approach and mainstream crosscutting objectives of the EU e.g. gender equality, youth, persons with disability, indigenous peoples, environment and climate change a.o.

The targeted CSOs were local Chinese CSOs, both those that have worked under EU-funded grant contract, but also those that never were contracted but may show interest.

Required outputs

• Preparation of a work plan during the first month of the assignments
• The first output submitted during or shortly after the first debriefing, was the work plan, the power-point template to be used respecting the EU Visibility guidelines. These were part of the Inception Report.
• Completion of requested Workshops Type A -B. Outputs included implementation of the requested services by workshops attended by members of selected CSOs.
• Submission of reports as described in section 5.1 Reporting

The main aim of this project was to enhance the promotion of Montenegrin companies and their products at an international level, with specific focus on SMEs. The project has establish the best possible conditions for increasing the export oriented activities of Montenegrin SMEs with respect to its geographical position and sector.

a) Technical assessment of concept notes in accordance with guidelines provided by the Contracting Authority, based on the published evaluation grids.

Expectation:

• 99 concept notes.
• Assessment of each concept note by two assessors individually.

b) Technical and financial assessment of full applications in accordance with guidelines provided by the Contracting Authority and are based on the published evaluation grids. Expectation:

• 32 full applications.
• Assessment of 4 concept notes per day and 2 full applications per day per assessor (on average).

c) Availability of assessors to advise the members of the Evaluation Committee is required.

d) The assessors are required to uphold the integrity of the evaluation process. Proposals are assessed online through PROSPECT or other secured IT tools if deemed necessary.

The main objectives of this evaluation are to provide the services of the European Union in charge of the listed contracts (i.e., DG NEAR and DG INTPA) with:

• an overall independent assessment of the past performance of the interventions Supporting Human Rights, Activists and Human Rights Monitors in Syria V, Supporting Human Rights and Human Rights Defenders in Syria IV and Supporting Human Rights and Human Rights Defenders in Syria III, paying particular attention to the results measured against the expected objectives; and the reasons underpinning such results;
• key lessons learned, conclusions and related recommendations in order to improve current and future Interventions.

In particular, this evaluation will serve the EU to further assess the utility of future support of the entity against the considerable fiduciary risk that comes with the high confidentiality of its operations and the difficulty of tracing financial flows. Furthermore, the evaluation will help the EU to understand whether the supported entity is sufficiently adapting and transforming itself, in view of the current political context and trends in Syria to become sustainable by creating a reputation among all Syrians for being an impartial whistle-blower on human rights violations when many similar organisations are often perceived as partial opposition bodies, pushing a particular political agenda, and therefore not taken seriously by other groups.

The main users of this evaluation will be the EU Delegation to Syria, DG INTPA Directorate G (Unit G.1) as well as DG NEAR Directorate B.1 (Middle East)

The objective of the contract was to support the EU Delegation to the Republic of Serbia and the Beneficiaries to ensure the timely, efficient and effective implementation of the Public Administration Sector Reform Contract to be implemented under the IPA 2015 national programme. In particular terms, the project: 1) assessed compliance of the Beneficiaries with the General and Specific Conditions for the release of fixed and variable tranches as set out in the Policy Matrix for the Sector Budget Support component of the Public Administration Reform and Public Finance Management Sector Reform Contract and 2) provided recommendations to the EU Delegation to the Republic of Serbia concerning the value of the tranches to be disbursed.

The overall objective of the project of this contract was to increase awareness and visibility of the EU-Mozambique cooperation partnership to the wider public, and improve the understanding of EU cooperation policies and partnership with Mozambique.

The purpose of this contract was to provide comprehensive visibility and communication services to the EUD to Mozambique. These communication services covered every aspect of the organisation and implementation of the EUD’s visibility and communications strategy, as directed by the management of the EUD.

DSIF provides concessional loans for funding of sustainable infrastructure projects, which cannot otherwise be financed on commercial terms in developing countries. The projects have to be sustainable, support the national development plans and contribute to sustainable growth and employment in line with the Sustainable Development Goals. The evaluation of DSIF served learning and accountability purposes for both the Investment Fund for Developing Countries (IFU)/DSIF and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA).

This evaluation had two objectives. The first objective was to assess DSIF’s relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, development impact and sustainability as well as commercial outcomes through its investments in developing countries. The evaluation applied the updated OECD/DAC evaluation criteria to DSIF investment projects. It involved an analysis of the project portfolio in terms of geographies, sectors and types of projects and funds, and the development of the portfolio composition over time. The evaluation included all DSIF activities since the last evaluation in 2002, although with an emphasis on the last ten years of operation. It included DSIF investments and, to the extent relevant, activities related to project preparation managed by DSIF.

The second objective was to assess the policy directions of the MFA and DSIF’s mandate over the evaluation period and provide an assessment of DSIF’s envisaged future role in Danish development cooperation, and whether the organisation was fit for purpose. During the evaluation period, Danish development policy had evolved, and expectations and requirements from the MFA towards DSIF had accordingly led to adjustments in the mandate. The evaluation took into account these changes in development policy and adjusted DSIF mandate when assessing its performance during the evaluation period, including changes in CSR/sustainability polices and the commercial framework under which this development finance instrument worked. The evaluation assessed the extent to which policy-driven initiatives derived from the Danish development policies had the potential to influence DSIFs portfolio, which was otherwise based on client demand. In this context the evaluation assessed the relevance of the adjustments made to the DSIF-mandate and, to the extent possible also, assessed whether the DSIF organisational set-up was Fit for Purpose, including risk management as well as results measurement and communication.

Case studies, including field visits were implemented in Bangladesh, Ghana, Mozambique, and Vietnam.

The overall objective of this project is to increase awareness, understanding and support for EU-South Africa development cooperation and its achievements in South Africa, particularly for South African audiences.

The specific objectives are:

• To communicate effectively EU-South Africa development cooperation, its activities and impact to the South African public.
• To collect and create success stories, case stories and results across sectors to enhance knowledge management and derive lessons learned for future cooperation.
• To sensitize South African partners working on Development Cooperation on the importance and practicalities of communication and visibility in the implementation of EU-SA cooperation programmes.
• To improve the impact of EU-funded project visibility activities.